What aspects of a CI/CD pipeline for Mute applications can be automated using MuleSoft-provided Maven plugins?
A. Compile, package, unit test, deploy, create associated API instances in API Manager Import from API designer, compile, package, unit test, deploy, publish to Am/point Exchange
B. Compile, package, unit test, validate unit test coverage, deploy
C. Compile, package, unit test, deploy, integration test
One of the backend systems involved by the API implementation enforces rate limits on the number of request a particle client can make. Both the back-end system and API implementation are deployed to several non-production environments including the staging environment and to a particular production environment. Rate limiting of the back-end system applies to all non-production environments. The production environment however does not have any rate limiting. What is the cost-effective approach to conduct performance test of the API implementation in the non-production staging environment?
A. Including logic within the API implementation that bypasses in locations of the back-end system in the staging environment and invoke a Mocking service that replicates typical back-end system responses Then conduct performance test using this API implementation
B. Use MUnit to simulate standard responses from the back-end system. Then conduct performance test to identify other bottlenecks in the system
C. Create a Mocking service that replicates the back-end system's production performance characteristics Then configure the API implementation to use the mocking service and conduct the performance test
D. Conduct scaled-down performance tests in the staging environment against rate-limiting back-end system. Then upscale performance results to full production scale
Explanation:
To conduct performance testing in a non-production environment where rate limits are enforced, the most cost-effective approach is:
C. Create a Mocking service that replicates the back-end system's production performance characteristics. Then configure the API implementation to use the mocking service and conduct the performance test.
Mocking Service: Develop a mock service that emulates the performance characteristics of the production back-end system. This service should mimic the response times, data formats, and any relevant behavior of the actual back-end system without imposing rate limits.
Configuration: Modify the API implementation to route requests to the mocking service instead of the actual back-end system. This ensures that the performance tests are not impacted by the rate limits imposed in the non-production environment.
Performance Testing: Conduct the performance tests using the API implementation configured with the mocking service. This approach allows you to assess the performance under expected production load conditions without being constrained by non-production rate limits.
This method ensures that performance testing is accurate and reflective of the production environment without additional costs or constraints due to rate limiting in staging environments.
MuleSoft Documentation: Mocking Services
MuleSoft Documentation: Performance Testing
An organization is building a test suite for their applications using m-unit. The integration architect has recommended using test recorder in studio to record the processing flows and then configure unit tests based on the capture events What are the two considerations that must be kept in mind while using test recorder (Choose two answers)
A. Tests for flows cannot be created with Mule errors raised inside the flow or already existing in the incoming event
B. Recorder supports smoking a message before or inside a ForEach processor
C. The recorder support loops where the structure of the data been tested changes inside the iteration
D. A recorded flow execution ends successfully but the result does not reach its destination because the application is killed
Explanation:
When using MUnit's test recorder in Anypoint Studio to create unit tests, consider the following points:
A. Tests for flows cannot be created with Mule errors raised inside the flow or already existing in the incoming event:
Explanation: The test recorder cannot record flows if Mule errors are raised during the flow execution or if the incoming event already contains errors. This limitation requires users to handle or clear errors before recording the flow to ensure accurate test creation.
D. A recorded flow execution ends successfully but the result does not reach its destination because the application is killed:
Explanation: If the application is killed before the recorded flow execution completes, the recorder captures the flow up to the point of termination. However, the final result may not be reached or recorded. This scenario should be avoided to ensure complete and reliable test recordings.
These considerations help ensure the accuracy and reliability of tests created using the test recorder.
References:
MUnit Documentation: https://docs.mulesoft.com/munit/2.2/
MUnit Test Recorder: https://blogs.mulesoft.com/dev/mule-dev/using-the-munit-test-recorder/
A stock broking company makes use of CloudHub VPC to deploy Mule applications. Mule application needs to connect to a database application in the customers on-premises corporate data center and also to a Kafka cluster running in AWS VPC. How is access enabled for the API to connect to the database application and Kafka cluster securely?
A. Set up a transit gateway to the customers on-premises corporate datacenter to AWS VPC
B. Setup AnyPoint VPN to the customer's on-premise corporate data center and VPC peering with AWS VPC
C. Setup VPC peering with AWS VPC and the customers devices corporate data center
D. Setup VPC peering with the customers onto my service corporate data center and Anypoint VPN to AWS VPC
Explanation:
Requirement Analysis: The Mule application needs secure access to both an on-premises database and a Kafka cluster in AWS VPC.
Solution: Setting up Anypoint VPN for the on-premises corporate data center and VPC peering with AWS VPC ensures secure and seamless connectivity.
Implementation Steps:
Advantages:
References
MuleSoft Documentation on Anypoint VPN
AWS Documentation on VPC Peering
A company wants its users to log in to Anypoint Platform using the company's own internal user credentials. To achieve this, the company needs to integrate an external identity provider (IdP) with the company's Anypoint Platform master organization, but SAML 2.0 CANNOT be used. Besides SAML 2.0, what single-sign-on standard can the company use to integrate the IdP with their Anypoint Platform master organization?
A. SAML 1.0
B. OAuth 2.0
C. Basic Authentication
D. OpenID Connect
Explanation
As the Anypoint Platform organization administrator, you can configure identity management in Anypoint Platform to set up users for single sign-on (SSO).
Configure identity management using one of the following single sign-on standards:
1) OpenID Connect: End user identity verification by an authorization server including SSO
2) SAML 2.0: Web-based authorization including cross-domain SSO
A platform architect includes both an API gateway and a service mesh in the architect of a distributed application for communication management. Which type of communication management does a service mesh typically perform in this architecture?
A. Between application services and the firewall
B. Between the application and external API clients
C. Between services within the application
D. Between the application and external API implementations.
Explanation:
In a distributed application architecture, a service mesh typically manages communication between services within the application. A service mesh provides a dedicated infrastructure layer that handles service-to-service communication, including service discovery, load balancing, failure recovery, metrics, and monitoring. This allows developers to offload these operational concerns from individual services, ensuring consistent and reliable inter-service communication.
References:
Understanding Service Mesh
Service Mesh for Microservices
According to MuleSoft's API development best practices, which type of API development approach starts with writing and approving an API contract?
A. Implement-first
B. Catalyst
C. Agile
D. Design-first
Explanation:
MuleSoft's API development best practices emphasize a design-first approach, which starts with writing and approving an API contract before any implementation begins. This approach ensures that the API's interface is agreed upon and understood by all stakeholders before the backend is built. It involves creating an API specification using tools like RAML or OpenAPI, which serves as a blueprint for development. This method promotes better planning, communication, and alignment between different teams and stakeholders, leading to more efficient and predictable API development processes.
References:
API Design Best Practices
MuleSoft's Approach to API Development
An organization is evaluating using the CloudHub shared Load Balancer (SLB) vs creating a CloudHub dedicated load balancer (DLB). They are evaluating how this choice affects the various types of certificates used by CloudHub deplpoyed Mule applications, including MuleSoft-provided, customer-provided, or Mule application-provided certificates. What type of restrictions exist on the types of certificates that can be exposed by the CloudHub Shared Load Balancer (SLB) to external web clients over the public internet?
A. Only MuleSoft-provided certificates are exposed.
B. Only customer-provided wildcard certificates are exposed.
C. Only customer-provided self-signed certificates are exposed.
D. Only underlying Mule application certificates are exposed (pass-through)
Explanation:
https://docs.mulesoft.com/runtime-manager/dedicated-load-balancer-tutorial
An organization plans to migrate all its Mule applications to Runtime Fabric (RTF). Currently, all Mule applications have been deployed to CloudHub using automated CI/CD scripts. What steps should be taken to properly migrate the applications from CloudHub to RTF, while keeping the same automated CI/CD deployment strategy?
A. A runtimefabric dependency should be added as a mule-plugin to the pom.xml file in all the Mule applications.
B. runtimeFabric command-line parameter should be added to the CI/CD deployment scripts.
C. A runtimefFabricDeployment profile should be added to Mule configuration properties YAML files in all the Mule applications. CI/CD scripts must be modified to use the new configuration properties.
D. runtimefabricDeployment profile should be added to the pom.xml file in all the Mule applications. CI/CD scripts must be modified to use the new RTF profile.
E. - The pom.xml and Mule configuration YAML files can remain unchanged in each Mule application. A --runtimeFabric command-line parameter should be added to the CI/CD deployment scripts
Explanation:
To migrate Mule applications from CloudHub to Runtime Fabric (RTF) while maintaining the same automated CI/CD deployment strategy, follow these steps:
Add runtimefabricDeployment Profile: Add a runtimefabricDeployment profile to the pom.xml file in all Mule applications. This profile will include the necessary configurations specific to RTF deployments.
Modify CI/CD Scripts: Update the CI/CD deployment scripts to use the new runtimefabricDeployment profile. This modification ensures that the deployment process will correctly reference the RTF-specific configurations when deploying applications.
Keep Configuration Files Unchanged: There is no need to change the pom.xml and Mule configuration YAML files other than adding the runtimefabricDeployment profile. This maintains consistency and reduces the risk of errors during the migration.
This approach ensures a smooth transition to RTF while leveraging existing CI/CD scripts with minimal changes, maintaining the automated deployment strategy.
References
MuleSoft Documentation on Runtime Fabric Deployment
Best Practices for CI/CD with MuleSoft
An organization is using Mulesoft cloudhub and develops API's in the latest version. As a part of requirements for one of the API's, third party API needs to be called. The security team has made it clear that calling any external API needs to have include listing As an integration architect please suggest the best way to accomplish the design plan to support these requirements?
A. Implement includelist IP on the cloudhub VPC firewall to allow the traffic
B. Implement the validation of includelisted IP operation
C. Implement the Any point filter processor to implement the include list IP
D. Implement a proxy for the third party API and enforce the IPinclude list policy and call this proxy from the flow of the API
Explanation:
Requirement Analysis: The security team requires any external API call to be restricted by an IP include list. This ensures that only specified IP addresses can access the third-party API.
Design Plan: To fulfill this requirement, implementing a proxy for the third-party API is the best approach. This proxy can enforce the IP include list policy.
Implementation Steps:
Advantages:
References
MuleSoft Documentation on API Proxies
MuleSoft Documentation on IP Whitelist Policy
| Page 3 out of 27 Pages |
| Previous |
Copyright © - All Rights Reserved