To implement predictive maintenance on its machinery equipment, ACME Tractors has installed thousands of IoT sensors that will send data for each machinery asset as sequences of JMS messages, in near real-time, to a JMS queue named SENSOR_DATA on a JMS server. The Mule application contains a JMS Listener operation configured to receive incoming messages from the JMS servers SENSOR_DATA JMS queue. The Mule application persists each received JMS message, then sends a transformed version of the corresponding Mule event to the machinery equipment back-end systems.
The Mule application will be deployed to a multi-node, customer-hosted Mule runtime cluster. Under normal conditions, each JMS message should be processed exactly once.
How should the JMS Listener be configured to maximize performance and concurrent message processing of the JMS queue?
A. Set numberOfConsumers = 1
Set primaryNodeOnly = false
B. Set numberOfConsumers = 1
Set primaryNodeOnly = true
C. Set numberOfConsumers to a value greater than one
Set primaryNodeOnly = true
D. Set numberOfConsumers to a value greater than one
Set primaryNodeOnly = false
Explanation:
Reference: [Reference: https://docs.mulesoft.com/jms-connector/1.8/jms-performance, , , ]
An organization has implemented the cluster with two customer hosted Mule runtimes is hosting an application. This application has a flow with a JMS listener configured to consume messages from a queue destination. As an integration architect can you advise which JMS listener configuration must be used to receive messages in all the nodes of the cluster?
A. Use the parameter primaryNodeOnly= "false" on the JMS listener
B. Use the parameter primaryNodeOnly= "false" on the JMS listener with a shared subscription
C. Use the parameter primaryNodeOnly= "true" on the JMS listener with a nonshared subscription
D. Use the parameter primaryNodeOnly= "true" on the JMS listener
Explanation:
In a clustered Mule runtime environment, when using a JMS listener to consume messages from a queue destination, it is essential to ensure that messages are appropriately received by all nodes in the cluster. The configuration must support high availability and scalability. Here's why option B is correct:
primaryNodeOnly="false": Setting this parameter to "false" ensures that the JMS listener is active on all nodes in the cluster, not just the primary node. This setting allows multiple instances of the JMS listener to run concurrently across different nodes, enabling them to consume messages from the JMS queue.
Shared Subscription: Using a shared subscription means that all nodes will share the consumption of messages from the queue. This approach prevents duplicate message processing, as each message is delivered to only one listener instance within the cluster. This configuration ensures that message processing is balanced across the nodes, improving throughput and reliability.
To configure the JMS listener in Mule, the XML configuration might look something like this:
xml
This setup ensures that all nodes in the cluster are involved in message processing, leveraging the high availability and load balancing capabilities of the cluster.
References
MuleSoft Documentation on JMS Listener
MuleSoft Clustering Guide
A Mule application is synchronizing customer data between two different database systems. What is the main benefit of using XA transaction over local transactions to synchronize these two database system?
A. Reduce latency
B. Increase throughput
C. Simplifies communincation
D. Ensure consistency
Explanation
* XA transaction add tremendous latency so "Reduce Latency" is incorrect option XA transactions define "All or No" commit protocol.
* Each local XA resource manager supports the A.C.I.D properties (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So correct choice is "Ensure consistency"
Reference: [Reference: https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/xa-transactions, ]
A mule application designed to fulfil two requirements a) Processing files are synchronously from an FTPS server to a back-end database using VM intermediary queues for load balancing VM events b) Processing a medium rate of records from a source to a target system using batch job scope Considering the processing reliability requirements for FTPS files, how should VM queues be configured for processing files as well as for the batch job scope if the application is deployed to Cloudhub workers?
A. Use Cloud hub persistent queues for FTPS files processing There is no need to configure VM queues for the batch jobs scope as it uses by default the worker's disc for VM queueing
B. Use Cloud hub persistent VM queue for FTPS file processing There is no need to configure VM queues for the batch jobs scope as it uses by default the worker's JVM memory for VM queueing
C. Use Cloud hub persistent VM queues for FTPS file processing Disable VM queue for the batch job scope
D. Use VM connector persistent queues for FTPS file processing Disable VM queue for the batch job scope
Explanation:
When processing files synchronously from an FTPS server to a back-end database using VM intermediary queues for load balancing VM events on CloudHub, reliability is critical. CloudHub persistent queues should be used for FTPS file processing to ensure that no data is lost in case of worker failure or restarts. These queues provide durability and reliability since they store messages persistently.
For the batch job scope, it is not necessary to configure additional VM queues. By default, batch jobs on CloudHub use the worker's disk for VM queueing, which is reliable for handling medium-rate records processing from a source to a target system. This approach ensures that both FTPS file processing and batch job processing meet reliability requirements without additional configuration for batch job scope.
References
MuleSoft Documentation on CloudHub and VM Queues
Anypoint Platform Best Practices
A payment processing company has implemented a Payment Processing API Mule application to process credit card and debit card transactions, Because the Payment Processing API handles highly sensitive information, the payment processing company requires that data must be encrypted both In-transit and at-rest.
To meet these security requirements, consumers of the Payment Processing API must create request message payloads in a JSON format specified by the API, and the message payload values must be encrypted.
How can the Payment Processing API validate requests received from API consumers?
A. A Transport Layer Security (TLS) - Inbound policy can be applied in API Manager to decrypt the message payload and the Mule application implementation can then use the JSON Validation module to validate the JSON data
B. The Mule application implementation can use the APIkit module to decrypt and then validate the JSON data
C. The Mule application implementation can use the Validation module to decrypt and then validate the JSON data
D. The Mule application implementation can use DataWeave to decrypt the message payload and then use the JSON Scheme Validation module to validate the JSON data
Explanation:
To ensure that data is encrypted both in-transit and at-rest, and to validate incoming requests to the Payment Processing API, the following approach is recommended:
TLS Inbound Policy: Apply a Transport Layer Security (TLS) - Inbound policy in API Manager. This policy ensures that the data is encrypted during transmission and can be decrypted by the API Manager before it reaches the Mule application.
Decryption: With the TLS policy applied, the message payload is decrypted when it is received by the API Manager.
JSON Validation: After decryption, the Mule application can use the JSON Validation module to validate the structure and content of the JSON data. This ensures that the payload conforms to the specified format and contains valid data.
This approach ensures that data is securely transmitted and properly validated upon receipt.
References:
Transport Layer Security (TLS) Policies
JSON Validation Module
When a Mule application using VM queues is deployed to a customer-hosted cluster or multiple CloudHub v1.0 workers/replicas, how are messages consumed across the nodes?
A. Sequentially, from a dedicated Anypoint MQ queue
B. Sequentially, only from the primary node
C. In a non-deterministic way
D. Round-robin, within an XA transaction
Explanation:
When a Mule application using VM queues is deployed to a customer-hosted cluster or multiple CloudHub v1.0 workers/replicas, messages are consumed in a non-deterministic way. This means that any of the nodes in the cluster or any of the workers can consume the messages from the VM queues, but there is no guaranteed order or specific pattern (such as round-robin or sequential processing).
This non-deterministic message consumption helps in distributing the load and handling messages more efficiently across multiple nodes or workers, improving the scalability and reliability of the application.
References
MuleSoft Documentation on VM Queues and Clustering
Best Practices for Deploying Mule Applications in Clusters
What Is a recommended practice when designing an integration Mule 4 application that reads a large XML payload as a stream?
A. The payload should be dealt with as a repeatable XML stream, which must only be traversed (iterated-over) once and CANNOT be accessed randomly from DataWeave expressions and scripts
B. The payload should be dealt with as an XML stream, without converting it to a single Java object (POJO)
C. The payload size should NOT exceed the maximum available heap memory of the Mute runtime on which the Mule application executes
D. The payload must be cached using a Cache scope If It Is to be sent to multiple backend systems
Explanation:
If the size of the stream exceeds the maximum, a STREAM_MAXIMUM_SIZE_EXCEEDED error is raised.
In preparation for a digital transformation initiative, an organization is reviewing related IT integration projects that failed for various for reason. According to MuleSoft’s surveys of global IT leaders, what is a common cause of IT project failure that this organization may likely discover in its assessment?
A. Following an Agile delivery methodology
B. Reliance on an Integration-Platform-as-a-Service (iPaaS)
C. Spending too much time on enablement
D. Lack of alignment around business outcomes
Explanation:
According to MuleSoft's surveys of global IT leaders, a common cause of IT project failure is a lack of alignment around business outcomes. When IT projects do not have clear business objectives or fail to align with the strategic goals of the organization, they are more likely to face challenges and fail to deliver value. Ensuring that IT initiatives are closely tied to business goals and have stakeholder buy-in is crucial for their success.
References:
Why IT Projects Fail
Aligning IT and Business Strategies
A Mule application is deployed to a cluster of two(2) cusomter-hosted Mule runtimes. Currently the node name Alice is the primary node and node named bob is the secondary node. The mule application has a flow that polls a directory on a file system for new files.
The primary node Alice fails for an hour and then restarted.
After the Alice node completely restarts, from what node are the files polled, and what node is now the primary node for the cluster?
A. Files are polled from Alice node
Alice is now the primary node
B. Files are polled form Bob node
Alice is now the primary node
C. Files are polled from Alice node
Bob is the now the primary node
D. Files are polled form Bob node
Bob is now the primary node
Explanation
* Mule High Availability Clustering provides basic failover capability for Mule. * When the primary Mule Runtime becomes unavailable, for example, because of a fatal JVM or hardware failure or it’s taken offline for maintenance, a backup Mule Runtime immediately becomes the primary node and resumes processing where the failed instance left off. * After a system administrator recovers a failed Mule Runtime server and puts it back online, that server automatically becomes the backup node. In this case, Alice, once up, will become backup ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference:
https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/hadr-guide So correct choice is : Files are polled form Bob node Bob is now the primary node
What is the MuleSoft-recommended best practice to share the connector and configuration information among the APIs?
A. Build a Mule domain project, add the Database connector and configuration to it, and reference this one domain project from each System API
B. Build a separate Mule domain project for each API, and configure each of them to use a file on a shared file store to load the configuration information dynamically
C. Build another System API that connects to the database, and refactor all the other APIs to make requests through the new System API to access the database
D. Create an API proxy for each System API and share the Database connector configuration with all the API proxies via an automated policy
Explanation:
The MuleSoft-recommended best practice for sharing the connector and configuration information among multiple APIs is to use a Mule domain project. The steps are:
Create a Mule domain project.
Add the Database connector and its configuration to the domain project.
Reference this domain project from each System API that needs to use the Database connector and configuration.
By using a domain project, you centralize the configuration and reuse it across multiple APIs. This approach ensures consistency, reduces duplication, and simplifies maintenance and updates to the connector configuration.
References
MuleSoft Documentation on Domain Projects
Best Practices for Reusable Configuration in MuleSoft
| Page 10 out of 27 Pages |
| Previous |
Copyright © - All Rights Reserved