Universal Containers is starting a Center of Excellence (COE). Which two user groups should an Architect recommend to join the COE?
A. Call Center Agents
B. Program Team
C. Executive Sponsors.
D. Inside Sales Users.
Explanation:
Program team and executive sponsors are two user groups that an architect should recommend to join the COE. A program team is a group of people who are responsible for managing and delivering the Salesforce projects and initiatives. They can provide the COE with the technical expertise, best practices, and project management skills. An executive sponsor is a senior leader who supports and advocates for the Salesforce program. They can provide the COE with the strategic direction, business alignment, and funding support.
Universal Containers (UC)operates globally from different geographical locations. UC is revisiting its current org strategy. Which three factors should an Architect consider for a single strategy? Choose 3 answers
A. Increased ability to collaborate.
B. Tailored implementation.
C. Centralized data location.
D. Consistent processes across the business.
E. Fewer inter-dependencies.
Explanation:
A single org strategy has the benefits of increased ability to collaborate, centralized data location, and consistent processes across the business. These factors can improve efficiency, data quality, and user adoption. A single org strategy may not allow for tailored implementation or fewer inter-dependencies, as different business units may have different requirements and dependencies.
The CTO at UniversalContainers is complaining to the software development managers that he has no visibility of their teams’ work status. What two software development methodologies should an architect suggest to solve this issue, and why? Choose 2 answers
A. Waterfall, because it defines a fixed schedule and duration for each activity.
B. DevOps, because monitoring and logging practices help you stay informed of performance in real time.
C. Scrum, because openness is one of the five core Scrum values.
D. Kanban, because one of its basic elements is to make everything visible, creating consistent transparency of work items
Explanation:
Two software development methodologies that an architect should suggest to solve the issue of visibility are Scrum and Kanban. Scrum is based on the value of openness, which means that the team members and stakeholders share information and feedback regularly and transparently. Kanban is based on the principle of making everything visible, which means that the team uses a visual board to track the progress and status of the work items. Waterfall is not a good methodology for visibility, as it does not allow for frequent communication and feedback. DevOps is not a methodology, but a culture and practice that aims to improve collaboration and delivery across the software development lifecycle.
Universal Containers is looking to construct a continuous integration process to help manage code quality. Which three tools should be used to enable this? Choose 3 answers
A. Force.com Migration Tool
B. Full Sandbox Environment
C. Source Control Tool
D. Project Management Tool
E. Continuous Integration Build Tool
Explanation:
A, C, and E are the correct answers, as Force.com Migration Tool, Source Control Tool, and Continuous Integration Build Tool are the tools that should be used to enable a continuous integration process to help manage code quality. A continuous integration process is a practice that involves merging code changes from multiple developers into a common repository, and then testing and validating them automatically, before deploying them to the target environment. Force.com Migration Tool is a tool that uses the Metadata API to retrieve and deploy metadata components, such as code, from one org to another. Source Control Tool is a tool that manages the versions and changes of the code, and allows for collaboration and integration among the developers.
Continuous Integration Build Tool is a tool that automates the testing and deployment of the code, and ensures that the code meets the quality and functionality standards. B is incorrect, as Full Sandbox Environment is not a tool that should be used to enable a continuous integration process, as it is a copy of a production org that is used for development and testing purposes, but not for merging, testing, or deploying code changes. D is incorrect, as Project Management Tool is not a tool that should be used to enable a continuous integration process, as it is a tool that helps to plan, organize, and track the progress of the project, but not to manage, test, or deploy code changes. You can learn more about these tools in the Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery module on Trailhead.
Universal Containers is validating an outbound change set from the Developer Sandbox to the production org. Which two locking behaviors will occur during a deployment? Choose 2 answers
A. The production org will be locked. Administrators cannot modify metadata during this time
B. The sandbox org will be locked. Administrators cannot modify metadata
C. The production org will be locked. Users can only Read data during this time
D. The production org will be locked. Users will still be able to Read/Write data to the org
Explanation:
A and D are the correct answers, as they are the locking behaviors that will occur during a deployment. A is correct, as the production org will be locked and administrators cannot modify metadata during this time, to prevent any conflicts or inconsistencies in the deployment. D is correct, as the production org will be locked and users will still be able to read/write data to the org, to minimize the impact on the business operations and user experience. B is incorrect, as the sandbox org will not be locked and administrators can still modify metadata, as the sandbox org is not the target of the deployment. C is incorrect, as the production org will not be locked and users can only read data during this time, as this would disrupt the business operations and user experience. You can learn more about the locking behaviors in the [Deploy Changes with Change Sets] unit on Trailhead.
Universal Containers (UC) have developed a managed package targeted for AppExchange. The product includes some Apex code to customize and create layouts. UC is in the testing phase of the package, so it's not certified yet. During testing on the target org, the Apex code for the layouts fails. Why are the Apex classes not able to access the metadata of the target org during testing?
A. Apex Settings to allow the access to metadata is not switched on.
B. UC needs to turn on Apex Settings within the custom metadata type.
C. The solution is flawed. UC should utilize the Tooling API from a web service call to modify the layouts.
D. UC needs to get the managed package certified by the Salesforce security review.
Explanation:
The reason why the Apex classes are not able to access the metadata of the target org during testing is that UC needs to get the managed package certified by the Salesforce security review. This is because Apex code in a managed package can only access the metadata of the target org if the package has passed the security review and has been granted the Modify Metadata permission. See Apex Metadata API for more details.
Universal Containers wants to delete the day’s test data in a partial copy sandbox every night, setting the sandbox back to a fresh state for tomorrows testing. The test data is approximately 1GB. What is the best strategy the architect should recommend?
A. Manually delete all records individually.
B. Execute a batch job that deletes all records created on the day.
C. Create a new developer copy sandbox every night.
D. Refresh the sandbox every night.
Explanation:
The best strategy to delete the day’s test data in a partial copy sandbox every night is to execute a batch job that deletes all records created on the day. This way, you can automate the process of cleaning up the test data and avoid manual work. Manually deleting all records individually is time-consuming and error-prone. Creating a new developer copy sandbox every night is unnecessary and wasteful, as developer copy sandboxes have limited storage and functionality. Refreshing the sandbox every night is also not feasible, as partial copy sandboxes have a refresh interval of 5 days.
A team of developers at Universal Containers has developed Apex Triggers and Apex Classes in a sandbox. The team has also written test classes to unit test these triggers and classes. When executed in the sandbox, all the test methods pass and all the classes meet the minimum code coverage requirement. But when they tried deploying these components to production, a few of these test methods failed What should an architect recommend?
A. Create test data in production before deploying the test classes
B. Set SeeAllData to True to use the data in production.
C. Explicitly set SeeAllData to True and generate data in test methods.
D. Do not use SeeAllData and generate data in the test methods
Explanation:
The best practice for writing test classes is to not use SeeAllData and generate data in the test methods. This ensures that the test classes are independent of the data in the org and can run successfully in any environment. Creating test data in production or setting SeeAllData to True can cause unexpected failures or data conflicts.
Universal Containers (UC) has four different business units (BUS) with different processes that share global customers. They have implemented a multi-org strategy with one org consolidating customer 360-degree view, and four orgs for the different BUS. Each of the BU orgs read and write customer information from/to the customer 360-degree view org in real time. UC is now launching a new BU that will use Salesforce. It does not share customers with the other BUS and needs flexibility in their Business processes. What should an architect recommend as org strategy for this new BU<br><br>
A. Use a new stand-alone Salesforce org for the new BU, not integrated with the others.
B. Deploy the new BU in customer 360-degree view org, and read and write customer information from it without need of custom integration.
C. Use the same Salesforce org of another BU that shares geographical localization with the new BU.
D. Use a new Salesforce org for the new BU, and customize integration so that it reads and writes customer information from the customer data org
Explanation:
The best option for the new BU is to use a new stand-alone Salesforce org, not integrated with the others. This will allow the new BU to have flexibility in their business processes, without affecting or being affected by the other BUs. Since the new BU does not share customers with the other BUs, there is no need to integrate with the customer 360-degree view org, which would add complexity and cost. Deploying the new BU in the customer 360-degree view org is not a good idea, as it would create confusion and duplication of data, as well as limit the customization options for the new BU. Using the same Salesforce org of another BU that shares geographical localization with the new BU is also not a good idea, as it would create conflicts and dependencies between the two BUs, as well as reduce the performance and security of the org. Using a new Salesforce org for the new BU, and customizing integration so that it reads and writes customer information from the customer data org is unnecessary and inefficient, as the new BU does not need to access or update the customer data of the other BUs.
A developer on the Universal Containers team has written a test class to test a method that involves a web service callout. Within the test class, the developer is supposed to load test data, create an instance of the Mock object, set the Test.setMock() to that Mock object, call startTest(), execute the code that makes the callout, call stopTest(), and compare the result with expectations. Unfortunately, the Developer forgot to use the Test.setMock() method step. What would happen when the developer runs this test class?
A. The test class fails without error message since the test class will simply skip the webservice callout during the execution.
B. The test class fails and the developer will see a message stating: Methods defined asTestMethod do not support Web service callouts.
C. The test class would make the web service callout and may or may not fail depending on the circumstances on the web service end
D. It is impossible to miss the Test.setMock() statement, the Developer Console will not let the developer save it since the test method callout
Explanation:
The test class will fail and the developer will see a message stating: Methods defined as TestMethod do not support Web service callouts. This is because the test class cannot make a real web service callout, as it would depend on an external service that may not be available or reliable. Therefore, the developer needs to use the Test.setMock() method to specify a mock class that simulates the web service response. The test class will not skip the web service callout, nor will it make the actual callout. It is possible to save the test class without the Test.setMock() statement, but it will not run successfully.
| Page 6 out of 12 Pages |
| Previous |
Copyright © - All Rights Reserved